I will be clear here: I can’t stand Rudy Guiliani, I can’t stand Ann Coulter, and I can’t stand most Democrats. I’m a Libertarian, and while I certainly believe Guiliani has the right to crossdress both politically and literally, I also believe people have every right to not vote for him for any reason, including his crossdressing. While clearly how Rudy Guiliani would govern - as a left wing communist extremist - is the most important issue, his drag-dressing escapades certainly do tell us a lot about his mentality and character. I mean, geezus, suppose your male neighbor dressed in drag. Would you let him babysit your children? But we are supposed to trust this man in charge of the biggest government in the world?

Yes, Democrats are hypocrites for only exposing Republican sins, while concealing their own. But you know what? Republicans are hypocrites as well for ignoring their own sins. So the only truth coming from each party is its criticism of the other, since both parties are bad. But the real sad thing here is that the real issue of a bipartisan sellout on matters of policy is ignored by distracting people with the “The other party is full of sinners, too” argument.

Sterilizing the debate by morphing it into a personality contest between Democrats and Republicans also promotes another fallacy: The idea that because a Democrat is bad, that makes Republicans good, or vice versa. Clinton’s sins don’t atone for Bush’s sins. Bush’s sins don’t atone for Clinton’s sins.

Seems to me the point of this blogpost was to a) mention that it was a pretty big, obvious problem and a little, on the side, b) didn’t you know that guy– yes, yes, he’s a cool leader for a city– but didn’t you know he can be rather… odd?

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/national_review_asks_but_will_it_play_in_peoria/

National Review already hit this subject, I suppose William F. Buckley is a RINO now too.