I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting…

Sorry, I couldn’t pass it up.

And? A hospital gets the most business during an ebola outbreak. A police station does record business during a riot. Doesn’t mean you want those things.

When has he said that Mike? When? Please, gives us a link to a documented case of him saying that because all that I can seem to find is him bending over backwards to say he WON’T attack Iran. Your so called “simple questions” need to be based in the real world and not in fantasy scenarios that exist only in your mind. Now if you’re done being schooled we adults have other things to do.

Anyways, there’s no point in answering a question founded in utter bullshit. You take a false premise, “I’m just saying that if the President thinks he may need to protect US troops from Iranian IEDs by possibly attacking Iran” and ask someone to try to predict the future.

However, I am bored right now, and like to kill time through pointless activities like video-games and lobbing clue-grenades™ at stupid hippies.

I would imagine US Stinger missile systems have been used against the US military as well, since we sent the muj tons of ‘em to fight the Soviet invasion. In fact, since we’re talking military history, it was the muj’s ability to take out Soviet helicopters that drug the invasion to a stalemate.

Furthermore, I would imagine that war-planners have contingency plans to attack Iran and Russia simultaneously. We probably have plans to attack Cuba, and Venezuela too. It’s just good policy; you can never be too prepared.

With all that being said, we will not have to attack Iran or Russia to keep them in line as long as surrendercrats like you don’t force a surrender in Iraq. Look at what’s going on in Iran. There is plenty of political unrest. Their only source of income is exporting oil. They can’t refine their own oil. You do the math.

This is all connected. US presence in Iraq is the lynch-pin. Russia and Iran are trying to fight a proxy war against the US through the “insurgency” in Iraq. Why? Because both countries know they can’t take us in a real fight. If they can’t push the US out of Iraq and the middle east right now, they will never be able to, and will have to deal with us.

You idiot leftists make one serious mistake when appraising Iraq. You act like the war was mishandled. The war was brilliant. It’s the nation-building part that hasn’t been handled well. The US military is still the preeminent fighting force on the face of the planet and if we decided to attack Russia, Iran, and China, we could pull it off as long as we aren’t trying to stick around to build a nation.

Remember, in the words of Frankj:

…the only way to stop fascism is through an informed populace and well-armed United States Marines… but mainly just the Marines.

Nor do you deserve one.

Something tells me he’s not intending to be funny though, at least not for the reasons *I* find him funny.

And no it’s FIAR who enjoys radioactive liberty, duh! He’s even got the domain registered. BTW, I earned the title of warrior by serving my nation in the most demanding of military branches. What have you done to serve your nation? (No, lighting up a ‘fatty’ doesn’t count.)