<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Conservatism? Part 2 - The Rule of Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/</link>
	<description>Passionate Positive News and Stories with Personality to increase your Happiness</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adding Happiness To Your To-Do List &#8212; Passionate America</title>
		<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-23032</link>
		<dc:creator>Adding Happiness To Your To-Do List &#8212; Passionate America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-23032</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 2 - Taking Your Happiness To The Next Level - Decrease Interruptions   Put Passionate America on your to-do list and get articles like this one delivered to you. Subscribe today! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 2 - Taking Your Happiness To The Next Level - Decrease Interruptions   Put Passionate America on your to-do list and get articles like this one delivered to you. Subscribe today! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taking Your Happiness To The Next Level - Decrease Interruptions &#8212; Passionate America</title>
		<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-23031</link>
		<dc:creator>Taking Your Happiness To The Next Level - Decrease Interruptions &#8212; Passionate America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-23031</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 2 - Taking Your Happiness To The Next Level - Decrease Interruptions   Passionate America delivers happiness daily, subscribe now!    digg_url = 'http://www.passionateamerica.com/taking-your-happiness-to-the-next-level-decrease-interruptions/';   digg_title = 'Taking Your Happiness To The Next Level - Decrease Interruptions';   digg_bodytext = ' Last episode I talked about adding that missing ingredient to your daily to-do list. The emails and instant messages I received were overwhelmingly positive and ranged from, &#8220;wow what a good idea&#8221; to, &#8220;I can&#8217;t believe that I had forgotten how to make time for happiness.&#8221; If you missed my last post, read it now, [...]';    ( function() { var ds=typeof digg_skin=='string'?digg_skin:''; var h=80; var w=52; if(ds=='compact') { h=18; w=120; } var u=typeof digg_url=='string'?digg_url:(typeof DIGG_URL=='string'?DIGG_URL:window.location.href); document.write(""); } )() [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 2 - Taking Your Happiness To The Next Level - Decrease Interruptions   Passionate America delivers happiness daily, subscribe now!    digg_url = &#8216;http://www.passionateamerica.com/taking-your-happiness-to-the-next-level-decrease-interruptions/&#8217;;   digg_title = &#8216;Taking Your Happiness To The Next Level - Decrease Interruptions&#8217;;   digg_bodytext = &#8216; Last episode I talked about adding that missing ingredient to your daily to-do list. The emails and instant messages I received were overwhelmingly positive and ranged from, &#8220;wow what a good idea&#8221; to, &#8220;I can&#8217;t believe that I had forgotten how to make time for happiness.&#8221; If you missed my last post, read it now, [...]&#8216;;    ( function() { var ds=typeof digg_skin==&#8217;string&#8217;?digg_skin:&#8221;; var h=80; var w=52; if(ds==&#8217;compact&#8217;) { h=18; w=120; } var u=typeof digg_url==&#8217;string&#8217;?digg_url:(typeof DIGG_URL==&#8217;string&#8217;?DIGG_URL:window.location.href); document.write(&#8221;"); } )() [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Conservatism? Part 3 - Personal Accountability &#8212; Passionate America</title>
		<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22506</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Conservatism? Part 3 - Personal Accountability &#8212; Passionate America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22506</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 2 - The Rule of Law [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 2 - The Rule of Law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Conservatism? Part 1 - Limited Government &#8212; Passionate America</title>
		<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22430</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Conservatism? Part 1 - Limited Government &#8212; Passionate America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22430</guid>
		<description>[...] What is Conservatism? Part 2 - The Rule Of Law  Want passionate stories and buckets of happiness delivered to you? Well maybe teacups of happiness. Subscribe to Passionate America today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is Conservatism? Part 2 - The Rule Of Law  Want passionate stories and buckets of happiness delivered to you? Well maybe teacups of happiness. Subscribe to Passionate America today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22236</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22236</guid>
		<description>Smokey-  I agree entirely with what you said.  I think that liberals do not get enough criticism for there legal transgressions, just look at what's going on with William Jefferson.  I'm just not sure that either side can say it respects/follows the rule of law more than the other.  I think that kind of absolutism is a huge problem with contemporary discourse.

Fox-  When did I say North was ever convicted of anything?  do you honestly think that everyone that has broken the law is found guilty?  Even if we disregard the actual arms sale, North admitted to lying to Congress which means he, just like Clinton, broke the law.  

Libby was found guilty of obstructing justice, plain and simple.  He broke the law, regardless of whether or not you think Plame  was a covert agent.

How is Lay irrelevant to the discussion, besides the fact he's dead?  You never stated in your piece that only elected conservatives follow the rule of law, but that conservatives in general respect it.  Lay was as influential as the equally detestable George Soros before his fall.  He had little respect for corporate law despite the fact that he was a true conservative.

Nixon may not have been as conservative as contemporary Republicans, but he was still a conservative.  I'd point to his support for Pinochet as one highlight of a conservative foreign policy, though I'd agree that his domestic policies were certainly more liberal.  He's probably not the best example of a typical conservative so I'll withdraw that one.

Liddy, however, was/is certainly a conservative.  Have you ever listened to his talk show?

Listen, I'm not saying being a conservative makes you a bad guy.  In fact I like and respect all the men here with the exception of Lay.  Nor am I saying that only conservatives break the law.  Liberals can be and are equally as adept at bending the rules, corruption, and general malfeasance.  I just don't believe that this sort of moral absolutism is accurate.

I did enjoy your piece, even though I don't agree with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smokey-  I agree entirely with what you said.  I think that liberals do not get enough criticism for there legal transgressions, just look at what&#8217;s going on with William Jefferson.  I&#8217;m just not sure that either side can say it respects/follows the rule of law more than the other.  I think that kind of absolutism is a huge problem with contemporary discourse.</p>
<p>Fox-  When did I say North was ever convicted of anything?  do you honestly think that everyone that has broken the law is found guilty?  Even if we disregard the actual arms sale, North admitted to lying to Congress which means he, just like Clinton, broke the law.  </p>
<p>Libby was found guilty of obstructing justice, plain and simple.  He broke the law, regardless of whether or not you think Plame  was a covert agent.</p>
<p>How is Lay irrelevant to the discussion, besides the fact he&#8217;s dead?  You never stated in your piece that only elected conservatives follow the rule of law, but that conservatives in general respect it.  Lay was as influential as the equally detestable George Soros before his fall.  He had little respect for corporate law despite the fact that he was a true conservative.</p>
<p>Nixon may not have been as conservative as contemporary Republicans, but he was still a conservative.  I&#8217;d point to his support for Pinochet as one highlight of a conservative foreign policy, though I&#8217;d agree that his domestic policies were certainly more liberal.  He&#8217;s probably not the best example of a typical conservative so I&#8217;ll withdraw that one.</p>
<p>Liddy, however, was/is certainly a conservative.  Have you ever listened to his talk show?</p>
<p>Listen, I&#8217;m not saying being a conservative makes you a bad guy.  In fact I like and respect all the men here with the exception of Lay.  Nor am I saying that only conservatives break the law.  Liberals can be and are equally as adept at bending the rules, corruption, and general malfeasance.  I just don&#8217;t believe that this sort of moral absolutism is accurate.</p>
<p>I did enjoy your piece, even though I don&#8217;t agree with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShadowFox</title>
		<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22232</link>
		<dc:creator>ShadowFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22232</guid>
		<description>Robert,  remind me again what Col. North was convicted of again?  Oh yeah, nothing.  Scooter Libby, gee ya got me since he was convicted of outing a secret agent.  Oh wait, you didn't because he wasn't.  He didn't leak her, wasn't connected with the leaker and didn't know who leaked.  Fitzgerald wanted a White House conviction to pad his resume and got Libby on a process crime unrelated to the investigation.  He could have convicted Fred Durst of "obstructing justice" in the Plame non-outing if he'd asked him enough questions.  You're batting 0-2 here buddy.

What does Ken Lay have to do with the post?  He's a businessman who's irrelevant to the discussion.  Strike 3, you're out.  But just to knock you out of the park who has EVER said that Nixon was a Conservative?  For those who failed English Comprehension it says right there in the opening paragraph of EVERY installment of this series that being Conservative and being Republican are NOT the same thing.  On your way over the outfield wall take that desperate reach of Liddy with you too.  Nobody has ever said he was a Conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,  remind me again what Col. North was convicted of again?  Oh yeah, nothing.  Scooter Libby, gee ya got me since he was convicted of outing a secret agent.  Oh wait, you didn&#8217;t because he wasn&#8217;t.  He didn&#8217;t leak her, wasn&#8217;t connected with the leaker and didn&#8217;t know who leaked.  Fitzgerald wanted a White House conviction to pad his resume and got Libby on a process crime unrelated to the investigation.  He could have convicted Fred Durst of &#8220;obstructing justice&#8221; in the Plame non-outing if he&#8217;d asked him enough questions.  You&#8217;re batting 0-2 here buddy.</p>
<p>What does Ken Lay have to do with the post?  He&#8217;s a businessman who&#8217;s irrelevant to the discussion.  Strike 3, you&#8217;re out.  But just to knock you out of the park who has EVER said that Nixon was a Conservative?  For those who failed English Comprehension it says right there in the opening paragraph of EVERY installment of this series that being Conservative and being Republican are NOT the same thing.  On your way over the outfield wall take that desperate reach of Liddy with you too.  Nobody has ever said he was a Conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokey</title>
		<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22213</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22213</guid>
		<description>Roberto:

"Conservatives respect the rule of law? Tell that to Richard Nixon, G. Gordon Liddy, Oliver North, Ken Lay, and Scooter Libby. There’s no more respect for the law on the right than there is on the left."

How about the Clintonistas and White Water?  How about documents down a certain pair of pants being taken from the national archives (Sandy Berger)?  How about perjury before a grand jury (on the part of the President no less)?

NO ONE in the current crop of politicians instill much confidence from me.  But, if I seem to remember, Republicans seem to find their way out the door (on their own or not) after "issues arise", yet liberals seem to get a pass.  How about our new Speaker of the House PROMISING (heck, all BUT signing a contract guaranteeing) earmark reform, and then simply renaming the process, and letting one of her own change the rules to FURTHER HIDE earmarks from votes, other representatives, the public..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roberto:</p>
<p>&#8220;Conservatives respect the rule of law? Tell that to Richard Nixon, G. Gordon Liddy, Oliver North, Ken Lay, and Scooter Libby. There’s no more respect for the law on the right than there is on the left.&#8221;</p>
<p>How about the Clintonistas and White Water?  How about documents down a certain pair of pants being taken from the national archives (Sandy Berger)?  How about perjury before a grand jury (on the part of the President no less)?</p>
<p>NO ONE in the current crop of politicians instill much confidence from me.  But, if I seem to remember, Republicans seem to find their way out the door (on their own or not) after &#8220;issues arise&#8221;, yet liberals seem to get a pass.  How about our new Speaker of the House PROMISING (heck, all BUT signing a contract guaranteeing) earmark reform, and then simply renaming the process, and letting one of her own change the rules to FURTHER HIDE earmarks from votes, other representatives, the public&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22183</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22183</guid>
		<description>Conservatives respect the rule of law?  Tell that to Richard Nixon, G. Gordon Liddy, Oliver North, Ken Lay, and Scooter Libby.  There's no more respect for the law on the right than there is on the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives respect the rule of law?  Tell that to Richard Nixon, G. Gordon Liddy, Oliver North, Ken Lay, and Scooter Libby.  There&#8217;s no more respect for the law on the right than there is on the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wild Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22172</link>
		<dc:creator>Wild Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22172</guid>
		<description>LOF, please do not ask me to choose sides in what is seeming like a brewing feud between the contributers here. If we can't get along as a team I'll go back to a team of one. I love having you guys/gal here contributing to the website and if we can work together Passionate America will continue to get better and better. I don't have time to mediate fights between the contributors. Work it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOF, please do not ask me to choose sides in what is seeming like a brewing feud between the contributers here. If we can&#8217;t get along as a team I&#8217;ll go back to a team of one. I love having you guys/gal here contributing to the website and if we can work together Passionate America will continue to get better and better. I don&#8217;t have time to mediate fights between the contributors. Work it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShadowFox</title>
		<link>http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22132</link>
		<dc:creator>ShadowFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionateamerica.com/what-is-conservatism-part-2-the-rule-of-law/#comment-22132</guid>
		<description>LOF: You know, I could think of a place where you can put your increasingly "helpful" and "positive" opinions...  If you think the paragraphs need to be broken up more, point out where and how it would improve the article.  But if it's more of this, shipping instructions will follow shortly.  Sorry if I don't write enough half baked fluff.

Bill: Thanks for the graphic man!  It looks cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOF: You know, I could think of a place where you can put your increasingly &#8220;helpful&#8221; and &#8220;positive&#8221; opinions&#8230;  If you think the paragraphs need to be broken up more, point out where and how it would improve the article.  But if it&#8217;s more of this, shipping instructions will follow shortly.  Sorry if I don&#8217;t write enough half baked fluff.</p>
<p>Bill: Thanks for the graphic man!  It looks cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
